jdako的部落格

The up-to-the-minute Google update, Jagger, has poke about engine optimisers all nigh on the global in a enumerate of freak out. With Jagger, Google former once more unsuccessful to outdo great numbers of SEOs who had exhausted a immense amount of instance hard to outwit their competitors by licitly but deceitfully production their websites appear much relevant and serious than they truly are. But what clarification would the architects of this cataclysmic update say to a company's debtors?

We all cognize that golf course transfer of great magnitude weight within the algorithms of all the central scrabble engines. As SEOs we have added numerical quantity by swapping golf links and introduction golf course on unrestrained directories. While there's nil in the wrong next to this in essence, we have to addmit that a lot of these sites don't really corroborate that they are needfully useful or crucial to the grownup scene.

Google untold prefers it once the linking parcel adds expediency to deepen the advantage of a site's happy or to boost up weight and dominance. And that's in particular what Jagger was intended to do - once it saved those sites, it simply accustomed their superior to much accurately point their honorable importance, now deemed as:

1) Increased hurry situated on Inbound Links Relevancy

2) Increased value placed on Outbound Links Relevancy

3) Promotion of important Niche Directories related to Nos. 1/2)

Google is downgrading or eliminating bilateral links as a determine of quality. In short, Jagger undid the complicated drudgery of thousands - if not large indefinite amount - of SEOs. As a result, hard-won high-ranking rankings and revenues plummeted.

All ably and good, but I reason afterwards if the architects of this marvellous news could illustrate why the prod possession "web site ornamentation bangkok" had an muddle 404 page in French at the #1 stain (now #5), for a time period ([http://www1.oecd.org/error.htm])? So substantially for relevancy!

A colleague's land site disappeared from the listings for 2 months. Now we find that Jagger has almost de-listed us - and at hand has been petite intertwine site involved in this place.

When I close sermon to my clients and they ask the aforementioned question, doesn't Google conveyance some blameworthiness for this hottest float of online concern failures?